We’re a sporting nation. We watch, play and discuss what has
happened on the weekend. What is interesting is the changing expectations
around sport. Let me explain.
The modern games evolved out of the 18th and 19th
centuries with the purpose of human competition in a civilised society. Cricket
and boxing first represented this ideal, followed by football and tennis. This
led to the phrase “Football is a gentleman's game played by ruffians”
In fact,
some have argued that sport has a civilising element.
Yet I think
that it is Christianity that shaped the way we approached sports.
You see, in
the 19th century England, character mattered more than achievement.
The way the game was played was more important than the outcome (“That’s just
not cricket”).
So how has
sport changed? The focus is on results.
Ancient Roman had sports, where the strong thrived and the weak perished. They performed armed combat entertaining audiences in grand outdoor stadiums. Crowds cheered as they watched gladiators compete in violent confrontations with other gladiators. Is this not the National Football League?
Ivan Cole
argues that “The proper purpose of sport in a healthy culture is transcendence.
To transcend is to surpass or exceed ordinary limits” The focus is not on
character but on achievement, over and above what would normally be expected.
Norbert
Elias argued that the modern game has become a re-enactment of hunter gatherer.
It is here that our primitive tribalism is displayed (including chants, threats
and euphoria).
With sport
becoming professional the focus in on achievement. This is not just for the
sportsperson. The crowd have expectations too. The athlete is viewed as an employee and the effectiveness, and
if possible the spectacle of the performance is all that counts.
No comments:
Post a Comment